🔗 Share this article

For months, threatening communications persisted. Originally, allegedly from a former police officer and a former defense officer, and then from law enforcement directly. Finally, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh claims he was called to the police station and warned explicitly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is one of many resisting a expensive project where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be demolished and transformed by a corporate giant.

"The culture of this area is exceptional in the world," states Shaikh. "However the plan aims to destroy our community and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of this community sit in stark contrast to the high-rise structures and elite residences that overshadow the area. Residences are built haphazardly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, small-scale operations emit toxic smoke and the air is filled with the suffocating smell of exposed drainage.

Among some individuals, the vision of a renewed Dharavi into a developed area of luxury high-rises, neat parks, contemporary malls and residences with two toilets is an optimistic future achieved.

"We lack adequate medical facilities, roads or drainage and we have no places for children to play," states a tea vendor, fifty-six, who migrated from Tamil Nadu in the early eighties. "The only way is to tear it all down and construct proper housing."

Resident Opposition

Yet certain residents, such as this protester, are resisting the plan.

None deny that the slum, historically ignored as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring financial support and improvement. However they fear that this plan – without public consultation – might transform premium city property into a luxury development, forcing out the disadvantaged, working-class residents who have resided there since the nineteenth century.

These were these marginalized, relocated individuals who developed the vacant wetlands into an extensively researched phenomenon of local enterprise and commercial output, whose output is valued at between a significant amount and $2m a year, making it among the globe's biggest informal economies.

Displacement Concerns

Out of about 1 million people living in the dense 2.2 square kilometer area, less than 50% will be able for replacement housing in the development, which is expected to take a significant period to finish. The remainder will be transferred to undeveloped zones and saline fields on the remote edges of the metropolis, potentially break up a historic neighborhood. Certain individuals will be denied homes at all.

People eligible to continue living in the area will be given flats in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the natural, communal way of residing and operating that has sustained the community for many years.

Businesses from garment work to pottery and waste processing are expected to reduce in scale and be moved to a designated "business area" separated from homes.

Survival Challenge

For those such as the leather artisan, a workshop owner and multi-generational resident to reside in Dharavi, the plan presents an existential threat. His rickety, three-storey workshop produces apparel – sharp blazers, luxury coats, decorated jackets – marketed in high-end shops in upscale neighborhoods and internationally.

His family lives in the accommodations underneath and employees and tailors – laborers from different regions – also sleep in the same building, permitting him to manage costs. Outside the slum, accommodation prices are typically tenfold more expensive for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

In the administrative buildings in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative shows an alternative outlook. Slickly dressed inhabitants mill about on bicycles and e-vehicles, purchasing western-style bread and pastries and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area outside a coffee shop and treat station. This depicts a stark contrast from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and budget beverage that supports the neighborhood.

"This represents no development for us," states the artisan. "This constitutes a huge real estate deal that will render it impossible for residents to remain."

Furthermore, there's skepticism of the corporate group. Headed by a prominent businessman – one of India's most powerful and an associate of the government head – the conglomerate has been subject to claims of crony capitalism and questionable practices, which it disputes.

Even as the state government describes it as a collaborative effort, the developer contributed a significant amount for its majority share. A case stating that the initiative was questionably assigned to the corporation is being considered in the top court.

Sustained Harassment

From when they initiated to actively protest the redevelopment, local opponents assert they have been faced an extended period of coercion and warning – involving communications, direct threats and implications that criticizing the development was comparable with anti-national sentiment – by figures they claim work for the business conglomerate.

Part of the group accused of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c