🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my personal history is stored on this app, and now they expect us to fork out money for it."

Poor ratings and a feeling of unfairness have taken over digital forums since Snapchat joined the latest digital platform to put a price tag on a function that individuals previously enjoyed using for free.

Snap declared in September that it would start charging users if they have more than five gigabytes of previously shared pictures and recordings stored as Snapchat Memories.

Among numerous users, these old snaps act as a window to the past – leading some to criticize the firm of "profit-driven motives" in messages on social media and poor reviews on mobile app marketplaces.

Other Choices

The company has equated its subscription options to those provided by tech giants for handsets.

As another possibility for those who don't want to pay, subscribers may save their saved content – which for many people span large volumes – to their own hardware.

The firm indicated that only a small number of subscribers would be influenced by the updated terms.

The company admitted that it was "never easy to move from using a feature without cost to covering the expense" – but implied it would be "justified by the benefits" for members.

A significant number of opposing the decision online seem to disagree.

Widespread Discontent

An online petition called the fee a "memory tax", with participants labeling it "Orwellian" and "ridiculous" – while an individual threatened to abandon the application in the future.

Meanwhile, in a negative rating on the digital platform, a user named an online commenter said it felt "deeply unfair".

"As a member of that generation, most of us have years worth of personal moments on Snapchat," they commented. "The vast majority only remained on the platform mainly for that reason. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have a long timeline of memories... Farewell Snapchat."

Furthermore, a London-based user, a young adult journalism student in the UK capital, revealed on TikTok her intention to delete the app.

"I decided that I wanted to export all my saved content as quickly as possible," she stated. "The vast majority of my youth have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the pictures in there are really important to me."

"This seems illogical to demand payment people for a feature that has been at no cost for so many years."

Unknown Fees

Snapchat has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would cost in the Britain – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

Yet a London resident Amber Daley, who resides in the city, said in a upload on the social platform that she would be "devastated" by these fees.

She noted that the app had become "a regular habit" since she first joined in 2014.

Although she acknowledged she understood the platform needed to generate revenue, the user proposed that the Memories feature means more to users than the firm may have anticipated.

"Personally, I believe it's a somewhat inequitable move to charge your users who have been loyal and devoted," she said. "These are not merely labeled 'Memories', these are our actual memories."

Industry Perspective

Businesses deciding to charge from customers for a feature that was earlier without cost is nothing new, and countless individuals pay for services like digital backup services to backup their media content from their mobile device.

The truth of storing data in the online servers – which various commentators in the digital field like to refer to as essentially "an external server" – is that it requires funding.

"Storing vast amounts of archived media on the service isn't a trivial amount," social media consultant Matt Navarra stated. "The platform has to attempt to identify a approach to fund the operation of storage, network usage, copies, content delivery, encryption – everything involved."

Yet the consultant noted that imposing charges for a function that had once been complimentary, and users had been prompted to utilize as such, may appear as a "deceptive practice" for some.

"Changing the rules after users have created this extensive stored content doesn't really sit right," he said. In the view of countless individuals, he continued, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're sentimental records."

The sentiment was reflected by those submitting negative feedback, with a user calling their archived media "deeply important to me".

"These archives contain all elements of my personal journey within them from happy occasions such as new additions, grieving for lost relatives, memories with friends/family, [and] my complete adolescence," they wrote.

Expert Analysis

A postdoctoral researcher, a university scholar at Utrecht University in the Holland, stated that the platform's decision shows the ramifications of business-oriented apps being used to save sentimental personal content.

"Platforms gain from this trust, connected relationship, and presumption of never-ending access, which even motivates some users to remain with the platform or continue to use it in order to review their archive," she told the media. "Yet these are not charitable custodians of personal memory."